LITERASI DIGITAL DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MAHASISWA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INGGRIS PADA ERA KECERDASAN BUATAN
Keywords:
digital literacy, critical thinking, English language learning, artificial intelligence, higher educationAbstract
The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed English language learning in higher education, making digital literacy and critical thinking essential competencies for students. This study aims to examine the relationship between digital literacy and students' critical thinking skills in English language learning in the era of artificial intelligence. The study employed a descriptive qualitative literature review by analyzing 20 scholarly articles published between 2021 and 2025. The findings indicate that digital literacy enables students to access, evaluate, and utilize digital information effectively, while critical thinking helps them analyze and verify information, including AI-generated content. The integration of AI into English language learning offers significant opportunities to enhance learning quality when supported by appropriate instructional strategies and responsible use. Therefore, strengthening digital literacy and critical thinking should become an integral part of English language learning in higher education to prepare students for the challenges of the digital era.
References
Ćetojević, H. (2024). Uticaj digitalne pismenosti na razvoj visokog obrazovanja. Педагошка Стварност, 69(2), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.19090/ps.2023.2.180-192
Durratul Hikmah, & Badilatil Walida. (2024). The Role of ChatGPT in Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking in Academic Writing. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.780
Faqih Luthfia, A. (2025). Digital Literacy for Developing Reading Skills in EFL Contexts: A Systematic Review. Aplinesia (Journal of Applied Linguistics Indonesia), 9(2), 40–64. https://doi.org/10.30595/aplinesia.v9i2.29838
Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M., Kallunki, V., Mundy, D., Romero, M., Romeu, T., & Gouseti, A. (2023). Critical digital literacies at school level: A systematic review. Review of Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3425
Iskandar, Z., Yulanda, N. I. P., Dubey, S. B., & Apriani, E. (2025). AI and Digital Literacy in Language Education: A Systematic Review on Critical Thinking Development. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 5(4), 1012–1024. https://doi.org/10.36312/pyz75g90
Liu, J., Sihes, A. J. Bin, & Lu, Y. (2025). How do generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and large language models (LLMs) influence language learners’ critical thinking in EFL education? A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00406-0
Lo, C. K., Yu, P. L. H., Xu, S., Ng, D. T. K., & Jong, M. S. (2024a). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: a systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5
Lo, C. K., Yu, P. L. H., Xu, S., Ng, D. T. K., & Jong, M. S. (2024b). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: a systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5
Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review. Computers, 12(8), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153
Nur Hidayati, Erna Andriyanti, & Novasa Adiyani. (2025). The Use of ChatGPT in English Language Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Tarling : Journal of Language Education, 9(1), 89–128. https://doi.org/10.24090/tarling.v9i1.14740
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Rahmi, N. S., & Putra, S. P. (2025). Integrating task-based learning module to develop HOTS in hospital administration students. Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development, 4(2), 1705–1722. https://doi.org/10.17509/curricula.v4i2.91175
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Van Damme, D., Zahner, D., Cortellini, O., Dawber, T., & Rotholz, K. (2023). Assessing and developing critical‐thinking skills in higher education. European Journal of Education, 58(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12563
Vuorikari, Riina., Kluzer, Stefano., & Punie, Yves. (2022). DigComp 2.2, The Digital Competence framework for citizens : with new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
NPJ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles in this journal are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA License This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work and source is properly cited.
Any derivative of the original must be distributed under the same license as the original.
