THE USE OF FINAL TEST AND PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT IN MEASURING THE LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT OF EIGHT GRADE STUDENTS AT SMPN 1 SUSOH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v6i2.2281Keywords:
Final Test, Portfolio Assessment, Spearman’s correlationAbstract
This study investigates the distinctions and interrelationships between Final Test and Portfolio Assessment in evaluating the academic achievement of eighth-grade students at SMP Negeri 1 Susoh. A quantitative, comparative-correlational design was employed, with a sample of 61 students selected through total sampling. Secondary data, consisting of Final Test and Portfolio Assessment scores from official school records, were analyzed. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test, and Spearman’s correlation, utilizing IBM SPSS Statistics version 26. The results indicate a significant difference between Final Test and Portfolio Assessment scores (p < 0.05), with Final Test scores generally higher than Portfolio Assessment scores. Furthermore, a significant positive correlation was found between the two assessment types, with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.565 (p < 0.05), suggesting that students with higher Final Test scores also tended to achieve higher Portfolio Assessment scores. These findings demonstrate that, although the two assessment methods yield different results, they are complementary in providing a comprehensive evaluation of students’ learning achievements. Therefore, integrating Final Test and Portfolio Assessment offers a more holistic approach to assessing student learning outcomes. The study's limitations include a relatively small sample size, focus on a single school, and reliance on secondary data, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Downloads
References
Al-Hawamdeh, B.O., Hussen, N., & Abdelrasheed, N.S. (2023). Portfolio vs. summative assessment: impacts on EFL learners’ writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF); self-efficacy; learning anxiety; and autonomy. Language Testing in Asia, 13, 1-29.
Ali, Q. I. (2024). Towards more effective summative assessment in OBE: a new framework integrating direct measurements and technology. Discover Education, 3(1).
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long‐term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 399 - 413.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 5th edition. SAGE Publications Ltd.
French, S., Dickerson, A., & Mulder, R. (2024). A review of the benefits and drawbacks of high-stakes final examinations in higher education. Higher Education, 88(3).
Hanafiah, H., Haryono, W., Juwarto, J., Pirngadi, H., & Ramadhan, F. R. (2024). Evaluation Of Curriculum Management And Assessment Systems At The Junior High School Level: Challenges And Solutions. IJOBBA : International Journal of Bunga Bangsa Cirebon. 3(2).
Mueller, J. (2005). The Authentic Assessment Toolbox: Enhancing Student Learning through Online Faculty Development.
Naka, L. (2025). Portfolio as an Assessment Tool: Impact on Student Participation and Improvement in EFL Learning. International Journal of Language Testing, 15(2), 134-152.
Pallant, J. 2020. SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). London, UK: McGraw-Hill Education
Zaabalawi, R.S., Zaabalawi, J. (2024). Portfolios versus exams: a study to gauge the better student assessment tool. Lang Test Asia 14(1), 28.
Zhan, Y., Boud, D. & Du, Z. (2025). Designing for authentic assessment: a scoping review. Higher Education
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zulfarkhannia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
NHJ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles in this journal are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA License This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work and source is properly cited.
Any derivative of the original must be distributed under the same license as the original.



















