EFEKTIVITAS KOMUNIKASI DIGITAL: PERAN SURVEYOR LAPANGAN SEBAGAI AGEN PUBLIC RELATION DAN MEMBINA HUBUNGAN DENGAN KLIEN

Authors

  • Tidar Astaning S Universitas Paramadina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v6i2.2237

Keywords:

digital communication, public relations, coal surveyor, client relationship management, boundary spanner.

Abstract

Field surveyors in the coal commodity inspection and certification industry are commonly perceived merely as technicians who take samples and measure tonnage. This article argues that such perception reduces the empirical reality of the surveyor's work, which in practice performs a public relations function at the most critical touchpoints between the surveying company, mining clients, coal buyers, shipping vessels, and port authorities. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach with literature study and document analysis on coal inspection practices at the draft survey stage, barge sampling, sample preparation in the laboratory, and the issuance of the Certificate of Analysis (CoA). Analysis results are determined not only by sampling but also by sample preparation, since errors in crushing, dividing, or drying at the preparation stage will carry through to the certified figures. The findings show that the effectiveness of digital communication thru WhatsApp, email, cloud-based reporting applications, and real-time field photo sharing is decisive in managing three main risks: the risk of analysis result disputes, the risk of loading delays, and the risk of losing client trust. Field surveyors are thus constructed as boundary spanners and informal public relations agents who build relationship management based on openness, responsiveness, and data integrity. This article recommends institutionalizing digital communication competencies within the competency standards for coal surveyors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217–230.

Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services—growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236–245.

Coombs, W. T. (2015). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., & Broom, G. M. (2013). Effective public relations (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.

Duncan, T., & Moriarty, S. E. (1998). A communication-based marketing model for managing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 1–13.

Grönroos, C. (2004). The relationship marketing process: Communication, interaction, dialogue, value. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19(2), 99–113.

Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Hallahan, K. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), 205–242.

Hutton, J. G. (1999). The definition, dimensions, and domain of public relations. Public Relations Review, 25(2), 199–214.

International Organization for Standardization. (2006). ISO 18283: Hard coal and coke — Manual sampling. Geneva: ISO.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Keller, K. L. (2009). Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15(2–3), 139–155.

Kliatchko, J. (2008). Revisiting the IMC construct: A revised definition and four pillars. International Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 133–160.

Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization–public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24(1), 55–65.

Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96.

Men, L. R., & Bowen, S. A. (2017). Excellence in internal communication management. New York, NY: Business Expert Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment–trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.

Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 136–153.

Speight, J. G. (2015). Handbook of coal analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 289–305.

Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.

Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Tidar Astaning S. (2026). EFEKTIVITAS KOMUNIKASI DIGITAL: PERAN SURVEYOR LAPANGAN SEBAGAI AGEN PUBLIC RELATION DAN MEMBINA HUBUNGAN DENGAN KLIEN. Nusantara Hasana Journal, 6(2), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v6i2.2237