APPLICATION OF PEAK OVER THRESHOLD METHOD FOR VALUE AT RISK ESTIMATION IN PROPERTY INSURANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v5i3.1599Keywords:
Property insurance, Extreme Value Theory, Peak Over Threshold, Value at Risk, Generalized Pareto DistributionAbstract
Insurance companies, as providers of financial protection services, must manage risks accurately to avoid misestimating potential losses that could jeopardize financial stability. The magnitude of potential loss incurred by the insurer due to policyholder claims is commonly referred to as claim severity. A widely used risk measurement tool is Value at Risk (VaR), which estimates the maximum potential loss under the assumption of normally distributed data. However, in reality, claim amounts often exhibit extreme behavior very large values that occur with low frequency rendering conventional methods insufficient for accurate risk estimation. To address this, the present study employs Extreme Value Theory (EVT) with the Peak Over Threshold (POT) approach to model the distribution of extreme claim values. The POT method produces a Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD), which effectively captures the heavy-tailed nature of the data. Extreme values are identified by selecting several candidate thresholds (u) using a mean excess function plot. The most appropriate threshold is then determined through the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test to ensure a good fit with the GPD. This optimal threshold is subsequently used to estimate the Value at Risk based on property insurance claim data from 2010 to 2016.
Downloads
References
Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Dagang, Wetboek van Koophandel voor Indonesie, 2013, Grahamedia Press, Jakarta
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. tanpa tahun. Definisi Perusahaan Asuransi Umum. Diakses tanggal 30 Juli 2025 dari situs resmi Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/pages/asuransi.aspx
Sartika, D. D. and Saleh, M. “Perlindungan hukum terhadap nasabah dalam proses asuransi kerugian,” Jurnal Hukum, Universitas Narotama Surabaya vol. 6, no. 4, Juni 2024, 12081-12092
Buhlmann, H. 1967. Experience Rating and Credibility, ASTIN Bulletin, 4, 199-207.
Embrechts, P., Resnick, S. I., dan Samorodnitsky, G. 1999. Extreme Value Theory as a Risk Management Tool. North American Actuarial Journal, 3(2), 30-41.
Gilli, M. and Kellezi, E. 2006. An Application of Extreme Value Theory for Measuring Financial Risk. Computational Economic 27, 1-23.
Coles, S. 2001. An Introduction to Statistical Modelling of Extreme Values. Bristol, Springer.
Gencay, R. and Faruk, S. 2004. Extreme Value Theory and Value at Risk: Relative peformance in emerging markets. international of journal forecasting 20, 287- 303.
Tse, Y.2009. Nonlife Actuarial Models Theory, Methods and Evaluation. Cambridge University Press. Inggris.
Jong, P. D. dan Gillian, Z. H. 2008. Generalized Linear Models for Insurance Data. Cambridge University Press.
Makarov, M. (2006). Extreme value theory and high quantile convergence. Journal of Operational Risk 2, 51–57
Jockovi´c, J. 2012. Quantile Estimation for The Generalized Pareto Distribution with Application to Finance. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 22, 297- 311.
Singh, A. K, David, E. A. dan Roberth, J.P. 2011. Value at Risk Estimation Using Extreme Value Theory. Australian Mathematical Science Institute. Perth, Australia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marisa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
NHJ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles in this journal are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA License This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work and source is properly cited.
Any derivative of the original must be distributed under the same license as the original.